Why You Should NOT Let AI Make Your Pictures

 So, I had an employer give me a children's book to upload to Amazon. If you aren't familiar with this process, there were two major mistakes she made that caused her to hire me, and these are the main reason I get hired: (1) Amazon paperback books have to have a minimum number of pages--24 pages for a paperback and 75 for a hardcover. If you have fewer pages than this, you will get an error. 

You can fix this by writing more or by only putting out a Kindle ebook. In her case, since she had done a children's picture book with relatively few pictures, I had her give me more pictures, which is another option for expanding content. You cannot simply add 20 blank pages to your 4 page book. Kindle will not allow this and will flag you if you try to do this. 

Now, adding more pictures can be a problem if you commissioned a set of pictures and you would have to pay to have more created. I could have taken the pictures she had and photoshopped some of them to change them enough to be another picture for the book if necessary. This would have probably been cheaper than if she commissioned entirely new artwork for which she wanted all the rights. (When you commission artwork for a children's book, you have to make sure the person creating the art knows what you intend to do with it, and I recommend signing a contract with the person that states it is okay for you to use the work in that way.)

She, however, bypassed the above trouble because all her pictures were AI generated. Now, bypassing the above trouble by using AI is not necessarily a good alternative. Although it was relatively easy to go back into the program and spit out 5 or so more pictures, the pictures were awful. I am not talking about just the new pictures. All the pictures were awful. There were five-legged cats and one chipmunk had a foot instead of a tail. The animals were not proportional to each other--with a giant rat towering over a small skunk. One picture had a happy woodland creature returning to its home--except there as a demon or something that looked like a demon with evil teeth and empty eyes waiting on the porch. 

There are plenty of critiques of AI-generated children's book art, so I won't go into all the details, but in addition to the above, the main characters did not look the same from page to page. 

You may think--what does a 4-year old care about real art? And, to some extent this is true. However, as an adult with children there are several things I know--one is that if I don't like reading a children's book to my kids, it will "disappear." I also believe that a parent's primary goal should be to educate their children so they can become participating members of society. If they learn at 4 that there is nothing wrong with five-legged cats (or worse they learn not to scrutinize art), they are never going to have a sense of when it is okay to actually draw a five-legged cat (i.e. for the cover of some fantasy novel that contains a creature that looks like a five-legged cat). If we don't teach kids the rules, they will grow up unable to follow any of them or to know when is a pointed time to break them. We feed into the Tiktok society where they only read headlines, scan clickbait articles, and watch brief, poorly-done video clips on repeat.  

We are already reaping the rewards of giving children "participation" rewards for doing nothing and not rewarding children who actually achieved things because we wouldn't want their peers to be jealous. What we have created are adults who have no reason to try to accomplish anything because someone will cheer them on regardless and the government or their parents will give them everything they need to survive without effort. These adults get a job but don't work. 

With the AI binge and no gatekeeper, our next generation of kids will no longer care about good artwork or good literature. They won't have attention spans long enough to bother with it. 

Internet Archive Password Security

 So, Internet Archive is one of my go-to resources for older books (along with Google and Gutenberg). During COVID, they apparently stopped keeping track of how many copies of newer, still-copyrighted books they were allowing people to browse at the same time. This led to a copyright lawsuit they lost--in case you haven't been following the news. So about three days ago, I decided to create a free account to be able to officially lend some of these books. 

...And then they were hacked. I normally use different passwords for just about everything I have an account for and these are randomized letters numbers and symbols. However, I am getting a little lazy in my old age, and although my G-mail account has a different password, I decided to link the Internet Archive account to my G-mail. So, although the password itself wasn't a big deal, I was concerned that the hackers might have been able to find a way into my G-mail account. 

This meant, that I immediately changed my password for my G-mail. 

The irony is that I was actually musing about a week ago that I was surprised our government (or any government) has not hacked into Internet Archive and gotten rid of some of the data stored there, but I digress. Allegedly, a pro-Palestinian group did this. 

There are two important lessons you should learn from this (1) the Wayback Machine (run by Internet Archive) is an amazing resource for saving web page history. I frequently use them for citations I put in my books. If you are looking for a charity to support, I recommend supporting them so they can upgrade their security and keep this valuable resource protected. (2) Don't use the same passwords for different accounts and don't link one account to another. I believe the hackers just wanted to make the news and probably wouldn't have gone any further, but they did publish what they found. If I had the same password for my G-mail account, it might already have been compromised. 

For some freelancers, a compromised account might be nothing more than a headache. However, I frequently work under NDAs (non-disclosure agreements). I take the security of those who hire me seriously. That means that don't store their projects on the cloud, and I follow other best practices--especially if they hired me and requested an NDA. If, however, I had been more lax in using the same passwords and in storing stuff on my Google account, I could have had a security breach as well. 

I encourage writers who deal with this sort of work to make sure your passwords for different accounts are truly different. There are free online password generators you can use if you have trouble thinking up random ones, I would just change them up a bit before using them to be safe. I then keep password hints (without writing out the full password) and the accounts each belongs to on a list in a drawer. 

Bad Jobs 4

 Wanted: A freelancer to set up a YouTube channel for me, create all the content, and make me money.

Here's the thing, if I am going to do all the work--I want all the money. When I ghostwrite books for people, they come to me with ideas. I take those ideas and turn them into marketable products, but I certainly don't do the marketing. If they don't take that step, they probably won't earn much. But if I am starting a YouTube channel to become the next influencer, and you want me to not only make the content, but come up with the ideas and market the channel--forget it. You don't get money for doing nothing.

Now, in theory, you could cheaply pay someone, who maybe isn't a good story writer but who has an imagination--to come up with a series of story prompts for you. Then you could pay a good writer to write each story and a good editor to edit them. Then you could pay someone to develop a marketing plan and market the book(s) for you. If it is done well, it would take a large investment up front, but you could still make money off of it. The difference is that you are putting in a large amount of money and hoping for a good return. You are taking on the risk. If a freelancer has the skills to do all of that, though, even a huge amount of money will probably not convince them to do it all for you--because presumably their work is making you more money than what you are paying them.

Memoirs: The Ultimate Revenge

 Memoirs and Autobiographies are both supposed to be factual representations of the authors life. However, it is a well-known fact that autobiographies will contain some bias--they should however be well-researched so that the author's memories are backed up by other sources. Memoirs, on the other hand, require no research. They claim to be glimpses of history as the author remembers it.

Most memoir writers write about scandalous things--growing up in poverty, abuse, and crime are common causes. All memoir writers seem to have an agenda--whether it is shocking members of the Pulitzer Prize committee into giving them an award or getting their families back for some perceived injustice or, in the case of JD Vance, advancing political careers. All three motives would be suspect if the person stuck with the researched truth, they are disgusting when research and family members frequently come forward to debunk the "memory." 

Aside from J D Vance's Hillbilly Elegy--were he supposedly documents his childhood being raised by Appalachian "hillbillies"--two other memoirs come to mind: Angela's Ashes (which won a Pulitzer) and Running with Scissors. These become talked about and make the authors rich while destroying the reputations of real people. Further, some of the "memories" are actually not even memories. They are pure fiction.

Consider Angela's Ashes--Mr. McCourt states he worked for the devout Catholic, Mrs. Brigid Finucane, and wrote threatening letters to collect money from people who owed her. When she died, he stole money from her and tossed her book where she kept track of the debts. No person in Limerick can remember this Mrs. Brigid Finucane. There were only Jewish moneylenders anywhere in Limerick. There was, however, a Vincent Finucane who ran a Radio shop, but Mr. McCourt never worked for him. During this time, Mr. McCourt did work for Jackie Brosnan. Jackie Brosnan is never mentioned in the book. 

Jackie Brosnan, however, did sell bicycles. Presumably, like Mrs. Brigid Finucane, he bought the items he was selling or built them for less money than what he sold them for. He then had a payment plan where people could take the bicycles home and come in each week to pay him for them. Again, this set up is similar to the one Mr. McCourt describes for Mrs. Finucane. Just as he was responsible for helping to get the money from those who did not repay Mrs. Finucane, he was also responsible for getting money from those who did not pay Mr. Brosnan. 

Curiously, he states he stole from Mrs. Finucane after she died. I wonder if the truth was that he was acting like most go-betweens for money lenders and stealing money from the people who owed Mr. Brosnan. Pilfering a little off here and there. We will never know because Mr. Brosnan adored Mr. McCourt and trusted him completely. He knows that Mr. McCourt lied in his book, but he still does not think anything bad about it and believes the book to be mostly true. 

In the case of Running with Scissors, the family sued the author. This was settled out of Court--which means the publishing company paid a big sum to shut the family up. The author has implied to people since that he won the case. 

The problem I have with people like this who do not care about truth--and I understand memory is fickle; I understand that sometimes we remember things differently than how they really were--but these authors take the truth and realize it isn't dramatic enough and so they fabricate things and claim they are "memories." Mr. McCourt knew he worked for Jackie Brosnan and not Brigid Finucane. He knew Jackie Brosnan was a kind gentleman whose payment plans allowed many people who could not afford bikes to have one. He should have known that in order for Mr. Brosnan to stay in business, the accounts needed to be collected. Still, he created a fictional character, made her a evil Catholic (he has big beef against the Catholic church and any of its adherents), and then made himself a hero by destroying her debt book when she died. 

J.D. Vance claims to have grown up with hillbillies, but he didn't really live in the hills of Appalachia. He lived in a coal town in Ohio. Most Appalachian people do not relate to his book, but the rest of America eats it up as honest truth. 

The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian is another one of these injustices. The man who wrote this book, which is making a lot of money as it is being pitched to school children across the U.S. (probably because of one of its sexually explicit material). If you want to read about the stereotype of an Indian, this book let's you know the stereotype is true. The sad thing is that I used to live with a Shawnee woman. I met a lot of Indians and none of them behaved like the people in this book. I never saw any of them drink or beat their kids. I only saw people who wanted to live in harmony with nature. So I can tell you from first hand experience this "Absolutely True Diary" is a lie. 

In addition to the families of these people, these books feed negative stereotypes of poor Irish people, poor Appalachian people, and poor Indians. They win prizes and are forced upon students of all ages as "good literature" when they are nothing more than the National Enquirer backed by Academics. There should be some requirement to verify the information found in any memoir or autobiography before it is given any award or distributed to students as mandatory reading. 

What really makes these memoirs MUSTN'T reads is that when people fabricate their memoir and get publicity because they wrote fiction they promoted as truth, it takes away from people who really went through horrible experiences like Jaycee Lee Dugard and her A Stolen Life: A Memoir. This book also contains some raw sexual experiences, since she was raped for decades by her kidnappers and writing the book was therapy. However, this book is a lesson--a lesson to people in law enforcement that they should always do their jobs even if they are threatened with lawsuits for doing them and a lesson to others that no matter what the situation you can survive. Her follow-up Freedom is equally enlightening.