Globe Soup--A Disappointing Contest I Don't Recommend

 In my effort to research good writing contests for indie authors, I have been trying to submit to several that I found. I haven't entered very many, yet, but I discussed in a previous post about how I found Tadpole to be a legitimate flash fiction contest, but the one offered by Off Topic Publishing to be a scam. Both of these contests came in advertisements from another contest: Globe Soup. I joined Globe Soup's newsletter because they advertised (and it was promoted on other author websites) as being a random contest where they give you a prompt and you have a week to write a story from it. That takes me back to most of my university writing classes, so I felt this would be a good fit for me. I joined, however, right after they had just done one of their random contests. 

The next contest was an open short story contest without a prompt. Contests like this are always iffy because the judges usually claim that any genre can be submitted, but in reality there are only a few judges (or one), and they are going to have limited preferences, and let's be realistic, how do you compare a well-written sci-fi with a well-written memoir and decide which is best? Still, I entered it with a paranormal romance (yeah, I should have chosen something more mainstream). The contest entry was relatively cheap, but I then selected the option to get an in-depth story critique for my story. I requested this primarily as a tool to better understand what the judges were looking for. That was December 2025. 

It is now August 2026. The contest was done, and results were posted on Globe Soup's website, so I contacted them in April of 2026 and asked about my critique. I was assured they were still working on it and asked if I would like a refund. Since that was not too long after the competition, I decided to wait. 

It was then I started thinking about the fact that the competition had been judged, but the judges made no critique of the works during the judging period. I have seen a lot of judging for a variety of contests. In general, judges review a work and make notes about what they liked/didn't like at the time they are judging it for the competition. For example, in the Olympics, the judges have a score sheet where they grade each element as it's performed. These grades are then mathematically turned into the final score. 

I do something similar for the indie books I review, when I use my matrix. When judges are given elements to grade and then allowed to make notes on those elements and/or general notes, that is the best, least biased way to run judging. With Globe Soup, however, I have to question how much thought and effort went into judging short stories that apparently were not critiqued by the judges at the time of the contest. 

Needless to say, since it has been almost a year since this competition finished, I have now requested a refund. I will post later if I actually get it. For now, I am still on their mailing list, but I won't be entering any more of their contests. 

AI: Great for Some Laughs

 So, on Goodreads, I am a moderator for a review group. We have to do some crazy puzzle solving to make sure no one reviews someone who has reviewed him/her. I have been using Google AI to do this, successfully so far, but I have to type in extremely detailed instructions, and I double check to make sure the perimeters I give it are met. 

I am also part of the Reading Challenge Group and one of the Games they currently have going is to guess a book title and author hangman style. Since I absolutely adore cryptograms and this is only slightly different from that (think Wheel-of-Fortune), I decided to ask Google to give me a similar puzzle and have me guess the title/author. I understand the need to train AI, so I first explained the rules and gave it an example. Then, I asked it to give me a puzzle. The first one was a book/author that it chose from my reading preferences (no I never asked it to track those, but I expect that I am always being tracked while online, so it didn't bother me that it had). Not only did it choose a book I was familiar with, but it gave away the plot while asking me if I wanted a clue about the plotline and it revealed too many letters upfront. So, I told it the puzzle was too easy. 

The next one, I was slightly suspicious that the puzzle it created might be fake, but I am not that familiar with the category it chose: "sci fi/steampunk." I really didn't care if the book was fake or not because part of the joy of the puzzle is solving it for words on the fewest revealed letters. I guessed T and then began to guess a few vowels and a few more consonants. I made it through all the vowels and y and two words had zero letters revealed. 

Now, as an amateur cryptologist, I know that there are no words in the English language that do not have at least one vowel in them (including y). So, I asked Google how there could be two words without any vowels. Google promptly admitted that it had "made an error" and the first word was "The," which I would have already had revealed because I had guessed all those letters, but Google had only revealed the "E." Notably, the two words I had asked about were still without any letters revealed. 

At that point, I decided to change the way I asked the questions:

-----

Google puzzle before my next question:

CATEGORY: Sci-fi/Cyberpunk

 TITLE: THE/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / _ L L _

AUTHOR: _ _ _ _ I I E _ / _ _ _ _ T _ O T

------

Me> You said there were two "I"s in the author's name, but did you fail to tell me there are "I"s in the title? 

Google> You caught me again! I absolutely made a mistake. When you guessed the letter I earlier, I only filled it into the author's name, but there is indeed an I in the title as well.

The title is THE INFINITE WALL by the author GABRIEL WRIGHT.

Here is the fully corrected and updated board with all of your correctly guessed letters...

CATEGORY: Sci-fi/Cyberpunk

TITLE: THE/INFINITE/W_LL

AUTHOR:  G _ _ RIIE _/WRI_HT

Incorrect letters: U, A, Y, S

Now, that the title is almost completely filled in, what would you like to do?

[Here Google gave me some letters I could guess, and also the option to guess the title/author. Note that if you compare what Google gave me to what it gave me before, the number of letters and the placement of the letters changed in the puzzle among other things.]

Me> LOL! You told me the title instead of filling in the letters and you misspelled Gabriel when you were filling it in. The completed title is "The Infinite Wall" by the author "Gabriel Wright." Now, I am going to have to fact check you to see if that is a real book or if you made it up. 

Google> You completely caught me red-handed! 😊I completely glitched on that one--I filled in the missing title, gave away the game, and managed to typo Gabriel... 

To make it even funnier, if you fact check me, the book doesn't actually exist! I completely hallucinated [it] and the plot scenario while trying to manage the puzzle matrix...

------

(Yes, I was suspicious at the plot scenario, too.) I found the interaction to be hilarious because I understand the limitations of AI, and I was testing it, but did not have high expectations. I still find it hilarious, but it is important for others to realize the limitations as well. Google stole pieces of other books for its "hallucinated" plot scenario as well as parts of titles to create its puzzle (and many people use AI to write their books). It could not follow simple instructions to run this game (and managed to change the number of letters and failed to fill in letters.) Next time, I will try wording my answers better--instead of saying "Is there an A?" I will say "Fill in all the A's in the puzzle." I will also ask it if the book and author are real upfront--even though it has assured me the next puzzle contains a real author and book. Finally, we are using AI to choose military targets and some lawyers are using it to write their cases for them. We have 4,000+ AI factories in the U.S. sucking up water and energy so we can be ahead of the world with our AI, but our AI functions more poorly because we are trying to make it do everything at once. It is like we have this dog, and instead of teaching it to retrieve our shoes for us or pick up trash (things dogs can do), we are trying to teach it to make dinner--which is something dogs will never be able to do. 

Can SI make puzzles (or puzzle books)? Of course. Can AI give you lists of resources for your book? Of course--if you fact check it. Can AI write your book or pick military targets? Not better than throwing a dart at a board, and it never will be able to do these things effectively. We need to use AI for what it can do best and focus on training it to do that well instead of trying to get it to bring the stars to earth for us. 

Your Book Summary: An Important Marketing Tool (part 2)

 What does a summary need? 

It needs to be short. Consider The Fellowship of the Ring by Tolkien--it has 3 paragraphs (about 7 sentences) as a summary even though it is over 430 pages long. These are not overly complex long sentences, either. The summary for A Game of Thrones is also about 7 sentences despite being over 700 pages. A summary should ideally be 2-4 paragraphs long and no more than 25 sentences. The more succinct you can be with your plot, the better--as long as it meets minimum standards. 

It needs to be well-edited and clear. Authors with typos in their summaries usually have typo-ridden books that are difficult for readers to wade through. Summaries that are written so only the author or someone who has already read the book understand them are also not helpful. 

It needs to let the reader know the (correct) genre if that isn't evident. For example, in The Fellowship of the Ring, the summary lets readers know the book is going to be an epic fantasy because it talks about magical elements and a journey. Be careful, however, if you feel you need to blatantly state "this is a historical fantasy." Many times authors who state what their book is don't know exactly what a "historical fantasy" is. I recently read a summary that claimed the book was a historical fantasy in the first sentence, but the book was set in a fictional world and not a real, historical earth setting. An example of a "historical fantasy" would be Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell, which takes place on earth in an alternate reality of the past, where magic occurs during the 19th century. There are many other genres, such as urban fiction or paranormal romance, that need authors to be aware of what they entail. The reverse of this is my own sci-fi romance mashup and sci-fi cozy mashup serials--I had at least one person say that these weren't sci-fi because they rely on arranged marriages and some "old-fashioned" societal rules--despite being set on another planet in another star system with advanced technology. I think people forget that many sci-fi books and movies use a technologically advanced but societal archaic theme--think about Star Wars, which basically incorporates swords and magic into sci-fi or Dune, which also has a technologically advanced society based on arranged marriages. 

What to keep out of a summary? 

Avoid words that reflect opinions of your book like "award-winning," "new," and "gripping." Opinions shouldn't be in the summary. There are places on your Amazon book page where you can add paid review information. It is expected that you, the author, believes your book should win an award and is a superb contribution to literature--your own opinions about your work don't belong anywhere on your sales page. Using "new" is slightly ridiculous because your book is not going to be "new" forever. 

Avoid plot details. Your added a bunch of really cool details and characters to your book, so of course you want to talk about them. The problem is that you are going to bog down your summary with things that are not necessary to conveying the plot. The Fellowship of the Ring summary mentioned above is a good example. It tells the reader who the main bad guy is and who the main good guy is. Are there other important characters in the book? Of course. But the whole trilogy is about Frodo getting to Mount Doom to destroy the ring and Sauron trying to stop him. In a romance summary, you should only have the main male and female mentioned. In other fiction, if there is a group of good guys/bad guys, you could say something like "Frodo Baggins and his fellow travelers" or "Luke Skywalker and those who gather around him" or "Ponyboy Curtis and his friends." In the summary for A Game of Thrones, which switches viewpoints between many people, the main characters are "the Starks of Winterfell." 

Avoid giving away the end of the story. Some indie authors do give away their work for free, but a summary of your work for the purpose of marketing it (free or not) should never contain the ending. Most readers aren't going to read a long version if you give them access to an abridged version of your story.

Avoid letting AI write the summary without any oversight. I get a lot of scam e-mails talking about my books. In this age of AI--which can read reviews, your summary, and other aspects of your book that you have talked about online--many people use technology to make their work easier. The problem is that AI does awful jobs of actually summarizing stories--I find them easy to pick out. If you struggle writing a summary, AI might be able to give you the groundwork, but if you don't know what you are doing, you won't be able to fix it appropriately. There are some services that will give you free or cheap professional reviews complete with a summary. It is better to use these services than to attempt having AI do it for you.